are concluded using logical reasoning (justification) that were thoroughly supported by course and research material and showed insightful and complex understanding as to how the improvement recommendations will lead to success(1.8-2.0)
1.7 points
Recommendations for improvement are concluded using logical reasoning (justification) that were supported by course and research material but 1 to 2 minor areas in the discussion were underdeveloped because of missing connections between either structure or culture
(1.6-1.799)
1.5 points
Most recommendations for improvement are concluded using logical reasoning (justification) that were supported by course and research material with missing connections.
(1.4-1.599)
1.3 points
Attempt was made to make recommendations but most were missing; those presented were either unclear or implied; conclusions derived from logical reasoning supported by the facts
class material and research was minimal or not present.(1.2-1.39) 0 points (0- 1.19) / 2 / 2 * Criterion score has been overridden Analysis of reading materials for recommendations of how companies can move from bureaucratic to flexible companies and why it is...
1.7 points
Recommendations for improvement are concluded using logical reasoning (justification) that were supported by course and research material but 1 to 2 minor areas in the discussion were underdeveloped because of missing connections between either structure or culture
(1.6-1.799)
1.5 points
Most recommendations for improvement are concluded using logical reasoning (justification) that were supported by course and research material with missing connections.
(1.4-1.599)
1.3 points
Attempt was made to make recommendations but most were missing; those presented were either unclear or implied; conclusions derived from logical reasoning supported by the facts