Description
Closing/Change Control
Create a 2-3 page Word document and include the following. Be sure to label each section. You can embed your change control log and close out document or attach them separately.
Often times a project will have a contract with a third party. Explain the importance of conducting procurement management when working with sellers and awarding contracts
Review one of the case studies from the previous week(s). Identify at least two unexpected changes that were encountered and will impact your project schedule by making your schedule 2-4 weeks late. Create a change control log. How will you handle this change?
Create a close out document that describes the steps for finalizing and implementing a project
__________________________________________________________________________________________
CASE STUDY
THE BATHTUB PERIOD
The award of the Scott contract on January 3, 2010, left Park Industries elated. The Scott Project, if managed correctly, offered tremendous opportunities for follow-on work over the next several years. Parks management considered the Scott Project as strategic in nature.
The Scott Project was a ten-month endeavor to develop a new product for Scott Corporation. Scott informed Park Industries that sole-source production contracts would follow, for at least five years, assuming that the initial R&D effort proved satisfactory. All follow-on contracts were to be negotiated on a year-to-year basis.
Jerry Dunlap was selected as project manager. Although he was young and eager, he understood the importance of the effort for future growth of the company. Dunlap was given some of the best employees to fill out his project office as part of Parks matrix organization. The Scott Project maintained a project office of seven full-time people, including Dunlap, throughout the duration of the project. In addition, eight people from the functional department were selected for representation as functional project team members, four full-time and four half-time.
Although the workload fluctuated, the manpower level for the project office and team members was constant for the duration of the project at 2,080 hours per month. The company assumed that each hour worked incurred a cost of $120.00 per person, fully burdened.
At the end of June, with four months remaining on the project, Scott Corporation informed Park Industries that, owing to a projected cash flow problem, follow-on work would not be awarded until the first week in March (2011). This posed a tremendous problem for Jerry Dunlap because he did not wish to break up the project office. If he permitted his key people to be assigned to other projects, there would be no guarantee that he could get them back at the beginning of the follow-on work. Good project office personnel are always in demand.
Jerry estimated that he needed $240,000 per month during the bathtub period to support and maintain his key people. Fortunately, the bathtub period fell over Christmas and New Years, a time when the plant would be shut down for seventeen days. Between the vacation days that his key employees would be taking, and the small special projects that his people could be temporarily assigned to on other programs, Jerry revised his estimate to $200,000 for the entire bathtub period.
At the weekly team meeting, Jerry told the program team members that they would have to tighten their belts in order to establish a management reserve of $200,000. The project team understood the necessity for this action and began rescheduling and replanning until a management reserve of this size could be realized. Because the contract was firm-fixed-price, all schedules for administrative support (i.e., project office and project team members) were extended through February 28 on the supposition that this additional time was needed for final cost data accountability and program report documentation.
Jerry informed his boss, Frank Howard, the division head for project management, as to the problems with the bathtub period. Frank was the intermediary between Jerry and the general manager. Frank agreed with Jerrys approach to the problem and requested to be kept informed.
On September 15, Frank told Jerry that he wanted to book the management reserve of $200,000 as excess profit since it would influence his (Franks) Christmas bonus. Frank and Jerry argued for a while, with Frank constantly saying, Dont worry! Youll get your key people back. Ill see to that. But I want those uncommitted funds recorded as profit and the program closed out by November 1.
Jerry was furious with Franks lack of interest in maintaining the current organizational membership.
QUESTIONS
- Should Jerry go to the general manager?
- Should the key people be supported on overhead?
- If this were a cost-plus program, would you consider approaching the customer with your problem in hopes of relief?
- If you were the customer of this cost-plus program, what would your response be for additional funds for the bathtub period, assuming cost overrun?
- Would your previous answer change if the program had the money available as a result of an underrun?
- How do you prevent this situation from recurring on all yearly follow-on contracts
__________________________________________________________________________________
4.6 PERFORM INTEGRATED CHANGE CONTROL
Perform Integrated Change Control is the process of reviewing all change requests; approving changes and managing changes to deliverables, project documents, and the project management plan; and communicating the decisions. This process reviews all requests for changes to project documents, deliverables, or the project management plan and determines the resolution of the change requests. The key benefit of this process is that it allows for documented changes within the project to be considered in an integrated manner while addressing overall project risk, which often arises from changes made without consideration of the overall project objectives or plans. This process is performed throughout the project. The inputs, tools and techniques, and outputs of the process are depicted in Figure 4-12. Figure 4-13 depicts the data flow diagram for the process.
The Perform Integrated Change Control process is conducted from project start through completion and is the ultimate responsibility of the project manager. Change requests can impact the project scope and the product scope, as well as any project management plan component or any project document. Changes may be requested by any stakeholder involved with the project and may occur at any time throughout the project life cycle. The applied level of change control is dependent upon the application area, complexity of the specific project, contract requirements, and the context and environment in which the project is performed.
Before the baselines are established, changes are not required to be formally controlled by the Perform Integrated Change Control process. Once the project is baselined, change requests go through this process. As a general rule, each project’s configuration management plan should define which project artifacts need to be placed under configuration control. Any change in a configuration element should be formally controlled and will require a change request.
Although changes may be initiated verbally, they should be recorded in written form and entered into the change management and/or configuration management system. Change requests may require information on estimated schedule impacts and estimated cost impacts prior to approval. Whenever a change request may impact any of the project baselines, a formal integrated change control process is always required. Every documented change request needs to be either approved, deferred, or rejected by a responsible individual, usually the project sponsor or project manager. The responsible individual will be identified in the project management plan or by organizational procedures. When required, the Perform Integrated Change Control process includes a change control board (CCB), which is a formally chartered group responsible for reviewing, evaluating, approving, deferring, or rejecting changes to the project and for recording and communicating such decisions.
Approved change requests can require new or revised cost estimates, activity sequences, schedule dates, resource requirements, and/or analysis of risk response alternatives. These changes can require adjustments to the project management plan and other project documents. Customer or sponsor approval may be required for certain change requests after CCB approval, unless they are part of the CCB.
4.6.1 PERFORM INTEGRATED CHANGE CONTROL: INPUTS
4.6.1.1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN
Described in Section 4.2.3.1. Project management plan components include but are not limited to:
- Change management plan. Described in Section 4.2.3.1. The change management plan provides the direction for managing the change control process and documents the roles and responsibilities of the change control board (CCB).
- Configuration management plan. Described in Section 4.2.3.1. The configuration management plan describes the configurable items of the project and identifies the items that will be recorded and updated so that the product of the project remains consistent and operable.
- Scope baseline. Described in Section 5.4.3.1. The scope baseline provides the project and product definition.
- Schedule baseline. Described in Section 6.5.3.1. The schedule baseline is used to assess the impact of the changes in the project schedule.
- Cost baseline. Described in Section 7.3.3.1. The cost baseline is used to assess the impact of the changes to the project cost.
4.6.1.2 PROJECT DOCUMENTS
Project documents that can be considered as inputs for this process include but are not limited to:
- Basis of estimates. Described in Section 6.4.3.2. Basis of estimates indicate how the duration, cost, and resources estimates were derived and can be used to calculate the impact of the change in time, budget, and resources.
- Requirements traceability matrix. Described in Section 5.2.3.2. The requirements traceability matrix helps assess the impact of the change on the project scope.
- Risk report. Described in Section 11.2.3.2. The risk report presents information on sources of overall and individual project risks involved by the change requested.
4.6.1.3 WORK PERFORMANCE REPORTS
Described in Section 4.5.3.1. Work performance reports of particular interest to the Perform Integrated Change Control process include resource availability, schedule and cost data, earned value reports, and burnup or burndown charts.
4.6.1.4 CHANGE REQUESTS
Many processes produce change requests as an output. Change requests (described in Section 4.3.3.4) may include corrective action, preventive action, defect repairs, as well as updates to formally controlled documents or deliverables to reflect modified or additional ideas or content. Changes may or may not impact the project baselinessometimes only the performance against the baseline is affected. Decisions on those changes are usually made by the project manager.
Change requests that have an impact on the project baselines should normally include information about the cost of implementing the change, modifications in the scheduled dates, resource requirements, and risks. These changes should be approved by the CCB (if it exists) and by the customer or sponsor, unless they are part of the CCB. Only approved changes should be incorporated into a revised baseline.
4.6.1.5 ENTERPRISE ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
The enterprise environmental factors that can influence the Perform Integrated Change Control process include but are not limited to:
- Legal restrictions, such as country or local regulations;
- Government or industry standards (e.g., product standards, quality standards, safety standards, and workmanship standards);
- Legal and regulatory requirements and/or constraints;
- Organizational governance framework (a structured way to provide control, direction, and coordination through people, policies, and processes to meet organizational strategic and operational goals); and
- Contracting and purchasing constraints.
4.6.1.6 ORGANIZATIONAL PROCESS ASSETS
The organizational process assets that can influence the Perform Integrated Change Control process include but are not limited to:
- Change control procedures, including the steps by which organizational standards, policies, plans, procedures, or any project documents will be modified, and how any changes will be approved and validated;
- Procedures for approving and issuing change authorizations; and
- Configuration management knowledge base containing the versions and baselines of all official organizational standards, policies, procedures, and any project documents.
4.6.2 PERFORM INTEGRATED CHANGE CONTROL: TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES
4.6.2.1 EXPERT JUDGMENT
Described in Section 4.1.2.1. Expertise should be considered from individuals or groups with specialized knowledge of or training in the following topics:
- Technical knowledge of the industry and focus area of the project,
- Legislation and regulations,
- Legal and procurement,
- Configuration management, and
- Risk management.
4.6.2.2 CHANGE CONTROL TOOLS
In order to facilitate configuration and change management, manual or automated tools may be used. Configuration control is focused on the specification of both the deliverables and the processes, while change control is focused on identifying, documenting, and approving or rejecting changes to the project documents, deliverables, or baselines.
Tool selection should be based on the needs of the project stakeholders including organizational and environmental considerations and/or constraints. Tools should support the following configuration management activities:
- Identify configuration item. Identification and selection of a configuration item to provide the basis for which the product configuration is defined and verified, products and documents are labeled, changes are managed, and accountability is maintained.
- Record and report configuration item status. Information recording and reporting about each configuration item.
- Perform configuration item verification and audit. Configuration verification and configuration audits ensure that the composition of a project’s configuration items is correct and that corresponding changes are registered, assessed, approved, tracked, and correctly implemented. This ensures that the functional requirements defined in the configuration documentation are met.
Tools should support the following change management activities as well:
- Identify changes. Identifying and selecting a change item for processes or project documents.
- Document changes. Documenting the change into a proper change request.
- Decide on changes. Reviewing the changes; approving, rejecting, deferring, or making any other decision about changes to the project documents, deliverables, or baselines.
- Track changes. Verifying that the changes are registered, assessed, approved, and tracked and communicating final results to stakeholders.
Tools are also used to manage the change requests and the resulting decisions. Additional considerations should be made for communications to assist the change control board (CCB) members in their duties, as well as to distribute the decisions to the appropriate stakeholders.
4.6.2.3 DATA ANALYSIS
Data analysis techniques that can be used for this process include but are not limited to:
- Alternatives analysis. Described in Section 9.2.2.5. This technique is used to assess the requested changes and decide which are accepted, rejected, or need to be modified to be finally accepted.
- Cost-benefit analysis. Described in Section 8.1.2.3. This analysis helps to determine if the requested change is worth its associated cost.
4.6.2.4 DECISION MAKING
Decision-making techniques that can be used for this process include but are not limited to:
- Voting. Described in Section 5.2.2.4. Voting can take the form of unanimity, majority, or plurality to decide on whether to accept, defer, or reject change requests.
- Autocratic decision making. In this decision-making technique, one individual takes the responsibility for making the decision for the entire group.
- Multicriteria decision analysis. Described in Section 8.1.2.4. This technique uses a decision matrix to provide a systematic analytical approach to evaluate the requested changes according to a set of predefined criteria.
4.6.2.5 MEETINGS
Change control meetings are held with a change control board (CCB) that is responsible for meeting and reviewing the change requests and approving, rejecting, or deferring change requests. Most changes will have some sort of impact on time, cost, resources, or risks. Assessing the impact of the changes is an essential part of the meeting. Alternatives to the requested changes may also be discussed and proposed. Finally, the decision is communicated to the request owner or group.
The CCB may also review configuration management activities. The roles and responsibilities of these boards are clearly defined and agreed upon by the appropriate stakeholders and are documented in the change management plan. CCB decisions are documented and communicated to the stakeholders for information and follow-up actions.
4.6.3 PERFORM INTEGRATED CHANGE CONTROL: OUTPUTS
4.6.3.1 APPROVED CHANGE REQUESTS
Change requests (described in Section 4.3.3.4) are processed according to the change management plan by the project manager, CCB, or an assigned team member. As a result, changes may be approved, deferred, or rejected. Approved change requests will be implemented through the Direct and Manage Project Work process. Deferred or rejected change requests are communicated to the person or group requesting the change.
The disposition of all change requests are recorded in the change log as a project document update.
4.6.3.2 PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATES
Any formally controlled component of the project management plan may be changed as a result of this process. Changes to baselines are only made from the last baseline forward. Past performance is not changed. This protects the integrity of the baselines and the historical data of past performance.
4.6.3.3 PROJECT DOCUMENTS UPDATES
Any formally controlled project document may be changed as a result of this process. A project document that is normally updated as a result of this process is the change log. The change log is used to document changes that occur during a project.