Description
I need this paper done by Saturday 2pm MST.
APA 7 is required for all sources used and cited.
Please review all attached details for Lab instruction (attached) for the option 1 & 2, as well as grading rubric and requirements noted.
Must use attached excel template and build upon.
Must use attached access or SQLite file for relational database work.
OPTION #1: Using Pivot Tables Product Sold
You are required to complete both parts A and B.
Part A:
Complete Lab 2-2 Use PivotTables to Denormalize and Analyze the Data (pp. 60 67) in your textbook.
Part B:
- Your analysis should be written as an essay and should include the following:
- Introduction
- Analysis
- Headings – Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, and Part 5 (i.e., Part 1: Identify the Questions) headings are shown in the Lab.
- Part 4 Answer Question 5 only
- Part 5 Answer Question 7 only
- Conclusion.
- Submit your analysis as a Word document and submit any additional requirements noted in the Lab (i.e., Excel files, tables, etc.).
undefinedCSU Global Writing Center (Links to an external site.)undefinedCSU Global Library (Links to an external site.)undefined
OPTION #2: Using Pivot Tables Product Attributes
You are required to complete both parts A and B.
Part A:
Complete Lab 2-2 Use PivotTables to Denormalize and Analyze the Data (pp. 60 67) in your textbook.
Part B:
- Your analysis should be written as an essay and should include the following:
- Introduction
- Analysis
- Headings – Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, and Part 5 (i.e., Part 1: Identify the Questions) headings are shown in the Lab.
- Part 4 Answer Question 6 only
- Part 5 Answer Question 8 only
- Conclusion.
- Submit your analysis as a Word document and submit any additional requirements noted in the Lab (i.e., Excel files, tables, etc.).
undefinedCSU Global Writing Center (Links to an external site.)undefinedCSU Global Library (Links to an external site.)undefined
Rubric
ACT480 Mod 2 CT
ACT480 Mod 2 CT
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements
|
| 20 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
16 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
12 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
8 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
|
| 20 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.
|
16 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
|
12 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
|
8 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.
|
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis
|
| 15 to >12.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.
|
12 to >9.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.
|
9 to >6.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.
|
6 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.
|
|
15 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources / Examples
|
| 5 to >4.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
|
4 to >3.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less?than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
|
3 to >2.0 pts
Below Expectation
Sources or examples don’t meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
|
2 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course are clearly deficient.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.
|
| 5 to >4.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.
|
4 to >3.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Project is fairly well organized and written and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.
|
3 to >2.0 pts
Below Expectation
Project is poorly organized and does not follow proper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.
|
2 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Project is not organized or well written and is not in proper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style.
|
| 5 to >4.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU Global resources on APA citation style, with no more than one significant error.
|
4 to >3.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global resources on APA citation style, with no more than two to three significant errors.
|
3 to >2.0 pts
Below Expectation
Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global resources on APA citation style, with four to five significant errors.
|
2 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global resources on APA citation style, with more than five significant errors.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
Total Points: 70
|
